As we approach election day, we might be thinking ahead on how we will deal with the past four years if we get a new president.
On thinking about this, I looked back upon the lies we were fed by the Bush administration about weapons of mass destruction, rendition, torture, and so many other human rights abuses all in the service of "freedom." Lies get wrapped in the red, white and blue because they sell much better, but they are still lies. Obama chose, with Biden as VP, to close that chapter without any accountability. I think that was a mistake because it paved the way for the degradation of the public discourse that devolved into 20,000 lies during the Trump era not to mention the wholesale destruction of the gains it took decades to achieve in race relations, voting rights, immigration and many other areas. From a Quaker perspective, in my humble opinion, I don't think there can be any moving forward without integrity. And by integrity what I mean is this: taking a hard look at what was done that violated not just our constitution, but the norms of decency we assumed were in place in our government and in our society. As things stand now, all bets are off. Next presidents, democrat or republican, can do whatever they like, unless it is specifically prohibited. We need to put some rules in place to limit the power of the presidency. The notion of the unitary executive needs to be hobbled if we are to maintain co-equal branches of government and not slip into dictatorship. We learned exactly how fragile our institutions were over the past four years. To forgive is appropriate, but we must not simply gloss over and forget. There has to be accountability. A presidential crimes commission would be a good start. Not because we want to punish Trump, but because a fair and just society demands it. Such a commission may not even choose to levy a penalty other than the indictment of history, but it needs to happen. Some say it will further divide an already divided country, but there can be no true healing without a full accounting. A form of restorative justice would be not only to roll back the draconian rules that were put into place, but uplift those who got left behind. If we look back on the civil war and reconstruction, the process of restorative justice was truncated by Andrew Johnson and we saw the rise of lynchings, jim crow laws, red lining and so much more physical and economic violence. We can't let that happen again. It is time that America comes to terms with our past and passes through the eye of this needle whole on the other side. Some queries that are with me on the eve of the election are:
4 Comments
Sylvain
11/1/2020 03:21:00 pm
The South African process worked well. I am not confident that the existing political divisions that currently exist here would be open to this sort of inquiry. Still, I would support one. Many thanks for the impressive osting.
Reply
11/1/2020 04:44:04 pm
Nice work.
Reply
Joseph, well articulated. Not being a Quaker but being opposed to state violence of any kind, perpetual war, increased police militarization -- for me -- coming from a conservative family, having spent years fighting police in school, the closing of schools by teachers unions for profit; the Quakers' and Labors' long tradition of public education remains crucial. Your article is educational. My conservative family members were educated in state schools and they're largely unaware they live not in a democracy but an empire, a crumbling empire treating not just foreigners as "subjects" but it's public and poor too. "Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens
Reply
Bob Elmendorf
11/15/2020 04:04:11 pm
This is a thoughtful piece and I have often thought along these lines, how are we on the one hand to set a modicum of standards to adhere to and hold people accountable for their actions, without further inflaming the divide.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
This blog was set up to post content of interest to Old Chatham Quaker members and attenders. Posts related to one's own personal spiritual journey, reports based on interviews with others, and reflections on Quaker-related topics are welcome. Posts by individuals are personal expressions and do not necessarily reflect those of the Meeting as a whole.
Guidelines for posting on website blog:
Submit to member of Communications committee; committee has editorial oversight over all content posted on the Meeting website. Be respectful of the nature of vocal ministry given in Meeting for Worship or other settings and any private conversations about spiritual matters. Cite source of any image or other external content submitted. Archives
November 2024
Categories |